Apr 13, · When students came home with their school-issued devices and online homework, parents’ data concerns extended from students’ data to the family’s home networks and devices. In addition to imposing surveillance on students at home as well as in the classroom, 14 ed tech had the potential to make other members of the household feel vulnerable Bromley, Journaling: Engagements in Reading, Writing, and Thinking (New York: Scholastic, ). A journal may be a required component of a principles of management course, so there may be extrinsic as well as intrinsic motives for starting to keep a journal Families, start reading! Educators, get it free Epic is the leading digital reading platform—built on a collection of 40,+ popular, high-quality books from + of the world’s best publishers—that safely fuels curiosity and reading confidence for kids 12 and under
Introduction to Principles of Management
Download the report as a PDF, scholastic math dictionary homework help for families. Students and their families are backed into a corner. Students are using technology in the classroom at an unprecedented rate. One-third of all K students in Scholastic math dictionary homework help for families. schools use school-issued devices. Student laptops and educational services are often available for a steeply reduced price, and are sometimes even free. However, they come with real costs and unresolved ethical questions.
This privacy-implicating information goes beyond personally identifying information PII like name and date of birth, and can include browsing history, search terms, location data, contact lists, and behavioral information.
Some programs upload this student data to the cloud automatically and by default. All of this often happens without the awareness or consent of students and their families. In short, technology providers are spying on students—and school districts, which often provide inadequate privacy policies or no privacy policy at all, scholastic math dictionary homework help for families, are unwittingly helping them do it. This paper presents what we have observed and learned about student privacy in the course of our investigation.
We aim to more precisely define the problems and issues around student privacy as they affect real students and their families, and to give stakeholders—including parents, students, administrators, and teachers—concrete steps they can take to advocate for student privacy in their own communities.
In Part 1we report on the results of a large-scale survey and interview study we conducted throughout In particular, we found that in an alarming number of cases, ed tech suffered from:. The data we collected on the experiences, perceptions, and concerns of stakeholders across the country highlights the need for ed tech companies to take seriously the privacy concerns of students, parents, teachers, and administrators.
Scholastic math dictionary homework help for families address:. In Part 3we turn our analysis into a call for action and present our recommendations for: school administrators, teachers, librarians, system administrators, parents, scholastic math dictionary homework help for families, students, and ed tech companies themselves.
Finally, we conclude by bringing our survey reporting, legal analysis, and recommendations together to briefly state the key problems and issues surrounding K digital student privacy in the U.
Want to learn more about digital privacy? Readers of this paper may be interested in digital privacy in general, not just in the educational context, scholastic math dictionary homework help for families.
Download the complete Spying on Students: School-Issued Devices and Student Privacy report as a PDF. Since then, we have fought for the privacy and security of student data on multiple fronts. While numerous and complex dynamics shape the ed tech and student privacy landscape, we have focused on only one: the threat to K students and their privacy posed by school-issued devices and ed tech platforms. Our narrow focus interacts with broader driving forces in ed tech.
While we cannot address them all, they provide valuable context and deserve acknowledgement. For example, ed tech gives disabled students new learning opportunities and is indispensable in special learning environments. Further, technology in schools gives states opportunities to understand student performance over time and be accountable for the effects of educational initiatives. While governments, schools, and industry shape the ed tech space, sensitive student data is caught in the middle—and scholastic math dictionary homework help for families is where EFF places its focus.
As ed tech growth outpaces legal and ethical understanding of its privacy implications, we risk placing students under silent yet pervasive surveillance that chills their creative expression both in and outside the classroom, and tracks their online behavior before they are old enough to understand its consequences.
In the long term, protecting student privacy means protecting children from surveillance culture at school and at home. In this white paper, we aim to paint a vivid picture of what it looks like when the privacy policies and practices of ed tech companies interact with real students and their families.
We hope to provide a more holistic understanding of not only the legal and policy framework in which ed tech is growing, but also the real-life privacy impact that educational technologies have on the individuals tasked with deploying, using, and understanding them. Student privacy is about more than data collection and legal protections; it is about real scholastic math dictionary homework help for families and their families.
What does it look like in real communities when ed tech company policies and state and federal legislation interact with students and their data? In latewe launched an online survey to collect information and stories from real people about their experiences with student privacy. Over the next year, we heard from over students, parents, students, teachers, administrators, and other stakeholders about the student privacy experiences and challenges they had encountered in their own communities.
Eight main trends emerged from survey responses and interviews. We found that 1 parents and students experienced a lack of transparency from schools, with parents reporting little or no disclosure of what technology their students were using in the classroom.
And their concerns were well-founded; scholastic math dictionary homework help for families we investigated the ed tech services reported as in use in classrooms, and found troubling trends in their privacy policies regarding lack of encryption, opaque data retention practices, and inadequate data aggregation and de-identification.
To successfully execute any privacy-protecting policies and safeguards, 7 teachers need better training in technology and digital privacy. Finally, 8 students need enhanced digital literacy education to take control of their privacy in the classroom.
Below we describe our methods and the characteristics of our respondents and their schools before delving into these eight findings in more detail. Finally, the survey concluded with an open-ended question requesting any additional information respondents wanted to share, from which we collected the quotes that appear throughout the findings below.
See full survey in Appendix. After the survey concluded, we selected several respondents for longer, in-depth interviews. We drew from the approximately one-third of survey respondents who provided their contact information and indicated that they were willing to be contacted by EFF. Instead, the survey results and case studies are meant to shed light on the human side of student privacy: the attitudes, perceptions, and types of individual concern and awareness that shape action around student privacy on the ground.
Students and parents make up the majority of our respondents at about 83 percent. Therefore, while we report on stakeholders across the spectrum, the survey puts us in a position to make the strongest assertions about students and parents. Respondents came from 45 states, Washington D. While this paper focuses on U. policy and practices, the geographical variety of survey responses serves as a reminder that ed tech companies—along with the services they offer and the privacy issues they pose—are global.
Google devices and platforms dominated survey responses. G Suite for Education was also the most popular platform, with 63 percent of respondents reporting G Suite use in their district.
Note that these numbers do not necessarily reflect the school adoption of these ed tech products and services nationally. They simply mean that we heard the most about Google, and therefore are in a position to report the most stakeholder experiences with its products, scholastic math dictionary homework help for families.
Among respondents, scholastic math dictionary homework help for families, 45 percent reported that their schools or districts did not provide parents with written disclosure about ed tech and data collection, and 31 percent were not sure if such disclosure was provided.
Further, scholastic math dictionary homework help for families, 32 percent of all respondents reported that their schools or districts did not offer opt-out—that is, non-technological classroom alternatives for families who did not want students using certain technology—and 37 percent were not sure if opt-out was available.
Again, these numbers do not describe school policy patterns across the country. Instead, these numbers characterize the environments of our respondents, who overwhelmingly experienced a lack of transparency and lack of choice with regard to student privacy.
We organize our findings into eight key takeaways, supported by quotes and statistics from the survey and in-depth case studies from subsequent interviews. The notice and disclosure process is broken. Parents who responded to the survey were overwhelmingly not notified when schools started using new softwares and devices, created email accounts for students, or posted pictures of students on school or teacher social media pages. We were given no scholastic math dictionary homework help for families about our first-grader receiving a device—a tablet—this year.
And when we ask questions, there is little information given at every level. Staff and student details—that is, full names and school email addresses—were passed to Google to create individual logins without consent from scholastic math dictionary homework help for families. Sometimes, parents did not receive any information about ed tech use until after the technology had already been implemented and was in active classroom use.
A parent in a California public school described how and when they were notified:. These respondents are not alone. Survey trends regarding written disclosure of school practices and policies show scholastic math dictionary homework help for families a majority of parents found themselves in the dark.
That adds up to 80 percent of surveyed parents who did not have clear, readily accessible disclosure, suggesting a breakdown of communication between schools and parents. As a result of these failures in communication, the burden of investigating ed tech and its effect on privacy fell on parents and even students.
With awareness of technology in the classroom but without details, parents launched often exhaustive investigations of how their children were using ed tech.
A North Carolina charter school parent described a months-long effort to obtain a comprehensive list of the software, programs, and apps her child was using in school:.
I have never received any written policy about how many apps the school uses and how they collect student data. The district maintains a website for parents to obtain information regarding technology in the classroom, but I have not found anything there about student privacy. What we want is a comprehensive snapshot of what technology experiences our son is having, especially if he has to log in to use them. Parents described confusing procedures around student privacy in their schools and districts.
The school was vague about what info was collected. In some cases, students took the investigation into their own hands. A student in a California private school described their efforts to find out what was installed on school-issued iPads:. Another student in California, this one at a public school, went online to find privacy policies:.
The companies providing the online services list privacy policies on their websites, but these policies are not shared directly with us or our parents. The impetus should be on schools and ed tech companies themselves, not the parents and students on whom the technology is imposed, to be transparent about what technologies are being used in the classroom, what privacy policies govern them, and what privacy implications they may carry.
As it stands, parents were on their own to find the information they needed to protect their children and advocate for their privacy. Katherine W. was seven years old, in the third grade, when her teacher first issued Google Chromebooks to the class. But as third grade came to a close, the district made clear that there would be no exception made the next year. But the district never sought written consent from Jeff or his wife.
The district provided no details about the types of devices students would be required to use or the data that would be collected on students. Rather than allowing Jeff to sign his daughter up for the Chromebook program, the district consented on his behalf, making the device mandatory for Katherine—with no ability to opt out. This means that Katherine is required by the school to use Google with a personalized Google account, and Google can create a profile of her—that is, a dossier of information that vendors collect on users for advertising, market research, or other purposes—and use it for commercial purposes the moment she clicks away from G Suite for Education.
Jeff went through several emails and a tense meeting before the district agreed to provide Katherine with a non-Google option for fourth grade—but once again declared that such an accommodation would not be possible for fifth grade.
Our legal team drafted a letter to the district to outline the privacy concerns associated with school-issued Chromebooks. They sell ads, they track information on folks. Schools should not require students to use tools that involuntarily, or without express parental permission, collect data on students, scholastic math dictionary homework help for families.
A parent from a Maryland public school had suspicions about data collection, retention, and eventual use by ed tech companies:. They are collecting and storing data to be used against my child in the future, creating a profile before he can intellectually understand the consequences of his searches and digital behavior.
What is Math Place?
, time: 0:43
Apr 13, · When students came home with their school-issued devices and online homework, parents’ data concerns extended from students’ data to the family’s home networks and devices. In addition to imposing surveillance on students at home as well as in the classroom, 14 ed tech had the potential to make other members of the household feel vulnerable Bromley, Journaling: Engagements in Reading, Writing, and Thinking (New York: Scholastic, ). A journal may be a required component of a principles of management course, so there may be extrinsic as well as intrinsic motives for starting to keep a journal Families, start reading! Educators, get it free Epic is the leading digital reading platform—built on a collection of 40,+ popular, high-quality books from + of the world’s best publishers—that safely fuels curiosity and reading confidence for kids 12 and under
No comments:
Post a Comment